SVM. Simulation And Comparison Between OSPF & RIP Routing Protocols
dc.contributor.author | MESBAH, Abdelbaki | |
dc.contributor.author | TEBBi, Sofiane | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-04T09:25:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-04T09:25:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.description.abstract | In a network topology various protocols are used for forwarding the packets. A routing table is maintained by routers for successful delivery of the packets from the source node to the correct destined node. The extent of information stored by a router about the network depends on the algorithm it follows. Most of the popular routing algorithms used are RIP, OSPF. in our project, we are evaluating the performance of RIP, OSPF for the parameters: convergence, throughput, queuing delay, utilization through simulation which has been attempted using OPNET as simulating tool. We are trying to find out which protocol suits the best for the network. key words: RIP, OSPF, OPNET, Simulation, Protocol. Résumé Dans une topologie de réseau, divers protocoles sont utilisés pour transmettre les paquets. Une table de routage est maintenue par les routeurs pour une livraison réussie des paquets du noeud source au noeud destinataire correct. L'étendue des informations stockées par un routeur sur le réseau dépend de l'algorithme qu'il suit. La plupart des algorithmes de routage populaires utilisés sont RIP, OSPF. Dans notre projet, nous évaluons la performance de RIP, OSPF pour les paramètres : convergence, débit, délai de mise en file d'attente, utilisation par la simulation qui a été tentée en utilisant OPNET comme outil de simulation. Nous essayons de découvrir quel protocole convient le mieux au réseau. Mots clés : RIP, OSPF, OPNET, Simulation, Protocole. الملخص في طوبولوجيا الشبكة، تُستخدم بروتوكولات مختلفة لإعادة توجيه الحزم. تحتفظ أجهزة التوجيه بجدول التوجيه من أجل التسليم الناجح للحزم من الجهة المصدر إلى الجهة الموجهة الصحيحة. يعتمد مدى المعلومات المخزنة بواسطة جهاز التوجيه حول الشبكة على الخوارزمية التي يتبعها. معظم خوارزميات التوجيه الشائعة المستخدمة هي RIP و OSPF في مشروعنا ، نقوم بتقييم أداء .RIP و OSPF للمعاملات: التقارب ، والإنتاجية، وتأخير الانتظار، والاستخدا م من خلال المحاكاة التي تمت تجربتها باستخدام OPNET كأداة محاكاة. من أجل هذا نحاول معرفة البروتوكول الذي يناسب الشبكة . الكلمات المفتاحية: البروتوكول، المحاكاة. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | MM/664 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://10.10.1.6:4000/handle/123456789/1650 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Université Mohamed el-Bachir el-Ibrahimi Bordj Bou Arréridj Faculté de Mathématique et Informatique | en_US |
dc.subject | RIP, OSPF, OPNET, Simulation, Protocol | en_US |
dc.title | SVM. Simulation And Comparison Between OSPF & RIP Routing Protocols | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- final project.pdf
- Size:
- 4.71 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- The goal of our research was to simulate the behavior of OSPF & RIP routing Protocols and present a comparative study between them while demonstrating which protocol is suitable for which kind of networks. Our contribution with this project was to help the readers understand the routing protocols (RIP & OSPF) and the differences between them and be able to choose which protocol suits them best. After the simulation of both RIP and OSPF and analyzing the results we concluded that OSPF is a better routing protocol then RIP in basically all the comparisons which were convergence, throughput, link utilization and queuing delay.So for us we can’t say a protocol is not efficient but each one has its own features , and if we were to choose between these 2 routing protocols RIP and OSPF in a big scale network which contains more then 16 machines, we will definitively choose OSPF protocol , and for a small network which contain less then 16 machines RIP could be better choice and it will cost less and be faster. Noting that transferring data in networks does not depend only on these two protocols RIP & OSPF, and as we notice that OSPF better then RIP but we notice that RIP better in certain tasks like “in the initialization time and the cost”, adding that OSPF is not the best routing protocol compared to other protocols such as the EIGRP which combine the two protocols “RIP & OSPF”, so we want in the future to do other comparisons and simulations between these three protocols “RIP , OSPF and EIGRP” inchallah.
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
- Description: